The ACC is supposed to have a conference call Saturday morning. Given
the record of previous ACC conference calls, I wouldn’t bet anything
I cared about that there will be any definitive news.
Control of the situation, meanwhile, is even further out of our hands now than
it has been before. If the ACC invite comes through (and whether it will seems
to depend almost entirely on the mood of the person being asked), that question
will be answered by the state government — and that answer WILL be yes.
As for me, I’m leaving the country. ;-) So I’ll leave you with some
musical amusement, detailing how a 1970’s musical visionary foresaw
the conference events of today.
Read More »
20 June 2003
/ Comment
/ Tags: realignment
First, listen to Homer.
I suggest loading his voice in a separate window, so you can click
the Play button as necessary throughout this piece.
WVU Rivals and the Washington Post were the first to report it tentatively. Now ESPN
and CBS SportsLine
are reporting it as done.
Virginia Tech could be going to the ACC… as team number 13.
Read More »
18 June 2003
/ Comment
/ Tags: realignment
Just checking in with some quick takes on the weekend’s events.
First expansion: we got nothin’. Not even any really good rumors or wild ideas
out there. The usual suspects said expansion was still on; other usual suspects
said not so fast. All we know is that there wasn’t a successful ACC conference
call on Monday. (By the way, BTN would like to thank Eric McErlain for the ACC
coverage compliments on Friday — and to apologize for the 404s some of you
probably got following his link. Hopefully we didn’t lose you permanently.)
(Newport News) Daily Press columnist David
Teel suggested Saturday that the ACC and Big East form an alliance.
Although he was actually responding to another compromise plan, I think TSL’s
Capitol Hokie’s description of it as a “non-aggression
pact” would be appropriate here, both in intent and in potential for long-term success.
Read More »
17 June 2003
/ Comment
/ Tags: realignment, basketball, baseball, travel
Before I begin this entry for real, I’d like to extend a welcome
to all the folks finding their way over here as a result of Steven
Den Beste and Mark Byron
linking to my most recent article. I’d also like to thank those two
gentlemen for driving more traffic to that one article than the entire site
had seen in the previous month. ;-) Welcome and thank you, everyone, and
feel free to stick around here at BTN. If this particular article
confuses you a bit, poke around in the archives for
the background.
If the past few days’ news in the ACC/Big East war hasn’t been totally perfect
for the remaining Big East schools, it’s certainly been miserable for the ACC,
and right now we’ll accept that. The ACC commissioner and presidents conducted
two separate conference calls Tuesday and Wednesday
without getting a positive vote for expansion. Pay no attention to ACC
Commissioner John Swofford’s bleatings that no vote was planned or taken. Both
days, if he had had the necessary seven (of nine) votes for expansion, those
presidents would have ended the conference call with three new, far-flung ACC
members. The UNC chancellor, Duke president, and UVa president held, though, and
the next conference call hasn’t even been scheduled for any more specific time
than “sometime next week.”
Read More »
13 June 2003
/ Comment
/ Tags: realignment
Hamish: “Is your father a ghost, or do you converse with the Almighty?”
Stephen: “In order to find his equal, an Irishman is forced to talk to God.
[Looking heavenward.] Yes, Father! [To William and his men.] The Almighty
says don’t change the subject, just answer the #$^*&@! question.”
—Braveheart
The ACC responded to the Big East’s suit this morning, with a story that was
clearly timed for the major regional newspapers’ Monday press run. ACC
commissioner (and former North Carolina AD) John Swofford released a
statement taking a swipe at Virginia Tech, claiming VT had had
discussions with the ACC on May 6.
Read More »
9 June 2003
/ Comment
/ Tags: realignment