BehindTheNet.org killin ur penalties

He ventured forth to bring light to the world »« Treo 700p, T+3 weeks

What's really wrong with Obama in Berlin


American presidential candidates leave the country for subtle small-audience campaigning surprisingly often. John McCain went to Ottawa and London in March with minimal fuss. But Barack Obama’s planned speech Thursday in Berlin is raising quite a bit more ire.

The iconography is one thing — the proto-Soviet sensibility of much of the Obama campaign’s graphic design (skilled as it is) is more jarring when presented in a foreign language. That goes double when the event is in a country noted historically for a cult of personality gone horrifically wrong.

But the real problem is the public nature of the event. It’s not being marketed to American voters in Berlin — you don’t need a German-language poster for that. It’s a mass event designed to simultaneously appeal to the German public and demonstrate Obama’s European popularity to Americans who can actually cast a vote for him.

What if he loses, though? Then Obama’s European campaigning has the consequence of further driving the political wedge between his mass support there and the rubes back home who — once again — had the temerity to elect someone not approved by their trans-Atlantic betters. It poisons the well overseas for anybody not on his side, and American politicians are doing too much of that already.

It could have benefits if he wins, sure. But he doesn’t have to pay up if his gamble fails. The country does.

24 July 2008 / 2 Comments / Tags: politics

Comments on “What's really wrong with Obama in Berlin”

  1. Josh, not sure I totally buy what you are saying. People in Europe and the rest of the world are going to be pretty upset if we elect a guy who sounds a lot like President Bush, whether Obama campaigns over there or not. Obama is popular overseas, I don’t think it is wrong for him to try to demonstrate that to an American public that thinks he doesn’t know anything about foriegn relations. Not to mention, it can’t hurt for him to start building relationships with heads of state, that way a little bit of the “get to know you” stuff can be skipped if he is elected.

    As to you citing Gore’s speeches overseas. How about the President’s remarks when leaving the G8 summit? http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/presidentbush/2008/07/it-was-his-fina.html

    Tom on July 24th, 2008 at 7:42 am
  2. Tom, you’re not addressing my point: what if he loses? By holding a mass public event there, he’s asking Europeans to invest trans-Atlantic political capital in him personally. Beneficial if he wins? Maybe, and I said that. But this mass investment in him will only widen the US/EU gap if American voters reject him. I don’t think he should bet the country’s foreign relations on his personal political future until, y’know, he actually takes office.

    President Bush’s remarks at the end of a conference partially designed to villify him were totally different. Did his sarcastic remark to a small set of his peers affect anything present or future? Not hardly. It got a one-day sidebar. Gore’s remarks were explicitly meant to hobble the sitting administration’s foreign relations, and that’s atrocious.

    JoshC on July 24th, 2008 at 4:37 pm