BehindTheNet.org killin ur penalties

Realignment: Following Our Cues »« In Defense of the French

Realignment: "Sweet Merciful Crap!"


First, listen to Homer. I suggest loading his voice in a separate window, so you can click the Play button as necessary throughout this piece.

WVU Rivals and the Washington Post were the first to report it tentatively. Now ESPN and CBS SportsLine are reporting it as done.

Virginia Tech could be going to the ACC… as team number 13.

Before CBS and ESPN brought it out as a definite, I rated the scenarios, given that the ACC does actually expand, as: - ACC goes to 12, dumping SU for VT: 45% chance - ACC is trying to call VT’s bluff, and get VT to reject an offer so Casteen has political cover to vote yes to SU/BC/Miami: 35% chance - ACC-13 is real, and includes VT: 20% chance

Now I’m not so sure.

What is sure, though, is that VT would be absolutely foolish to reject an offer if it comes. We’d take some serious PR lumps, and probably deserve them. But too much political capital has been spent on us for us to waste it now. And even getting into a reconfigured Big East with Notre Dame as a full-time member (which is not super-likely) would be inferior to joining the conference for which we are a perfect fit geographically, culturally, academically and financially. We have high-level academic partnerships with three current members (UVa on the NoVA Center, Maryland on the vet school, and Wake Forest on a new biomedical engineering program). We are within 5 hours’ drive of 7 of the current 9 members.

We’ve been trying to get into this conference for forty years, ever since Virginia Tech’s tenth President, Walter Newman, left office. It was he who rejected the offer that seven other Southern Conference rebels made in the mid-1950s, to form a new mid-Atlantic athletic conference of like-minded institutions, with its headquarters 2 1/2 hours south of VT in Greensboro, NC. We’ve paid for that mistake with fifty years of wandering the athletic wilderness, through the dying SoCon, full independence, the Metro Conference, the Big East Football Conference, the Atlantic Ten-Or-So, and the horrendously unstable Big East.

It’s time to go home.

UPDATE, 20 June 2003: the idea of Virginia Tech having rejected the ACC in 1953 is under very strong dispute. In today’s TSL Mail, TechSideline.com’s Will Stewart writes that VT was actually left off the original invite list due to its 3-33-3 record in football from 1948 to 1951. So the cause is questionable, but the effect remains the same — the fact that we weren’t in the ACC has given us fifty years of instability.

18 June 2003 / 2 Comments / Tags: realignment

Comments on “Realignment: "Sweet Merciful Crap!"”

  1. I still can’t help but not like the option of joining the ACC. Of course, I like the option of not joining even less…

    Everything just….stinks. Nasty, smelly, month old socks kind of stink.

    Well, I know how the girl who’s fourth choice for a date feels…

    So, if Duke and NC decide to ‘accept the inevitable’ again, will the ACC decide to uninvite us? (repeat until ACC expansion dies a horrible death? sounds ok to me)

    Did I mention that something stinks?

    Andrew Hardin on June 18th, 2003 at 10:44 pm
  2. I hear you. The whole situation just sucks. The ACC may not be a particularly welcoming place, but it’s where we belong, though we will have to travel some pretty foul roads to get there.

    I’d like to see the BE football schools break away, bring in Loserville and sit at 9, but I think we know that that conference would be no more stable than the Big East is now. Tough to plan for the future when you can’t turn your back on any of your conference mates without getting knifed.

    Josh on June 18th, 2003 at 10:58 pm