BehindTheNet.org killin ur penalties

Realignment II: It Begins »« Punching Buttons: Mobile Data and Mass Transit

Quick Hits, 5 June


Yeah, I haven’t posted in a while. Work’s been getting busier, and I spent much of last weekend on a totally extracurricular coding project. The fruit of that project, though, is that once again you can AIM hawkeye5Cell to send me a (free) text message on my cell phone. AOL and SunCom don’t have their act together yet on the real AIM forwarding service to GSM phones, so I wrote a Java client using a couple of third-party libraries for the AOL and SMTP interfaces. Eventually I will release this app to the public, but I need to:

  • debug re-connecting after a connection drops
  • move configuration options from hard-coded Strings into an XML file
  • figure out how to properly build a standalone JAR file using Ant — I’ve got web-apps down, but basic JARs not so much
  • resolve licensing dilemmas, which may require me to rewrite the SMTP library so the whole app can be GPL’d, in line with Jaimlib

A few column thoughts have crossed my mind over the last week, but I don’t think any qualified for a full column on their own. Judge for yourself, though.

  • Sammy Sosa — the finding that his other 76 bats were all cork-free seems to indicate to me that this was an isolated incident. Rob Dibble said Wednesday morning on ESPN radio that while he didn’t believe for a second that this was an honest mistake by Sosa, he figured that Sammy could just be desperate to get out of his slump. I’d say suspend him for 5 games and get over it. This should not call into question his previous accomplishments.
  • Realignment — if the message boards speak truth, there’ll probably be another full story on this one soon. Donna Shalala and five other (current) Big East presidents, including VT’s Charles Steger, held a brief meeting in Washington today, at the American Enterprise Institute (a rather strange place for Shalala to be seen, that’s for sure). My money says this was a “So Long, And Thanks For All The Fish” moment for Miami, and maybe a courtesy call in an attempt to stave off lawsuits. Fat chance there, unless everybody involved winds up happy, and that’s not very likely.
  • Denominationalism — Ian posted a link to an interesting blog by a young former Baptist pastor who converted to Catholicism and is telling his conversion story via blog. My main problem with Catholicism has always been the exaltation of mere humans — particularly the Pope, but I also have issues with the Catholic attitude toward the Virgin Mary that seems to verge on worship at times. The Pope issue is pretty simple, though — I don’t believe that “[U]pon this rock I will build my church” (Matthew 16:18) was meant to invest Peter and any human-appointed line of successors with Christ’s authority, but rather just to set him as an example of faith. (I know there’s a lot more doctrine behind it than this, but this seems to be the root of it all.) This is one main division I have a tough time getting past; the other is free will vs. predestination, which is definitely worth a whole column to itself. Once you get past those two issues, the division of the church into denominations is really just different assignment of style points.

So… any on-topic commentary from the peanut gallery?

5 June 2003 / 5 Comments / Tags: tech, life, baseball, realignment

Comments on “Quick Hits, 5 June”

  1. okay, lets try this again…. well you’ve hit on one of the issues that makes me want to start my own blog (which is coming soon by the way…) As a former catholic myself, I can definitely agree with the issue of the Pope and to some extent, the Virgin Mary. But the interesting thing is that I’m not alone as Catholic. In fact, to quote a Catholic minister (not a priest mind you) and professor for Virginia Tech, “if you name 5 of the most derisive issues between the denominations [which include the Pope, Mary and the other biggie, women involvement], you’ve also name the 5 most derisive issues between Catholics.” With that being said, are the current denominations just projections of internal Catholic disagreements? Since the world catholic [little c] means “universal” are the various denominations divisions of Christianity or divisions of the Catholic [big C] church?

    capt.taco on June 5th, 2003 at 9:38 am
  2. change the last “world” to “word”… where’s the grammer check? :-)

    capt.taco on June 5th, 2003 at 9:39 am
  3. You’re starting a blog? Excellent. Drop me a line when it’s up and I’ll link it.

    I think you’ve got a point re: denominations as a projection of intra-Catholic disagreements. At the historical moment when most Protestant denominations split off, there were certainly people who agreed with the dissenters on some level, but didn’t feel the issue was worth leaving the capital-C Church over. I’m sure those people’s intellectual successors still exist today inside the Catholic church.

    The exception, of course, was the Anglicans and their descendants (including Methodism), who were split off because King Henry VIII didn’t like the idea of any other human telling him what to do (including, but not limited to, not divorcing one’s wife). Most of the doctrinal differences between Anglicans and Catholics were tacked on post-split, to make the break (and the King) look better-justified in retrospect.

    Josh on June 5th, 2003 at 10:34 am
  4. ;-P Then where should we start on Baptists???? I know I’ve got problems with Catholics (starting with ex’s), but Southern Baptists make me want to do a jig sometimes, too …

    Brian Childress on June 6th, 2003 at 4:50 pm
  5. Severe style point differences there (starting with the whole “getting saved” thing), but doctrinally, Baptists tend to cast a pretty wide net. The Southern Baptists have had a rash of resignations and departures from the SBConvention because they’ve tried to get their people to stick to a more strict doctrinal line instead of being so scattershot about things like predestination, female ordination, etc.

    Josh on June 6th, 2003 at 4:59 pm