BehindTheNet.org killin ur penalties

Realignment: Slamming The Door »« Realignment: The Final Movement

Realignment: Tech Stabbed In The Back


The ACC has officially extended invitations to Miami, Syracuse and Boston College. Virginia Tech fans must now pray for a miracle that can only be delivered by Notre Dame or a friendly television network.

Miami needs money, and in the end, Virginia Gov. Mark Warner’s political pressure came to naught: both North Carolina and Duke reversed their original NO votes, leaving UVa as the sole opponent and carrying non-VT expansion by an 8-1 vote (with seven votes required).

The only thing that can save Big East football powers Virginia Tech and West Virginia now is an infusion of money from the Big East, almost certainly involving a split of football schools from basketball and an new, vastly larger television contract from either ABC (current rights holder) or NBC (which may be looking for a new sports package), to start in 2005. Chas Rich’s Pittsburgh Panthers are in better shape, as strong rumors last night and today indicated that Big 10/11 athletic directors were to hold an emergency meeting to discuss expansion, almost certainly meaning the inclusion of Pittsburgh. Both Penn State and Ohio State have come out in strong support of Pitt in recent days.

The wild card is Notre Dame; if by some miracle Big East Idiot-In-Charge Commissioner Mike Tranghese can convince the Domers to join the football schools, the BCS bid is saved no matter who leaves, and WVU and VT will be hanging on by a thread. As you can tell, I’m not too confident in his abilities, considering that according to former NC State AD Les Robinson (as quoted in the Raleigh News and Observer), Tranghese started this whole mess five years ago in a closed-door meeting intended to move Miami, SU, and BC to the ACC, sell VT and WVU down the river, and preserve his beloved basketball conference at the expense of the football conference he was also charged with promoting.

I could go on about how ABC/ESPN preferred Tech, or how University of Miami president Donna Shalala exhibited the values one might expect from a Clinton appointee, or how VT, WVU and UConn are all about to have to bite the bullet on multi-million dollar stadium construction based on Miami’s assurances of commitment to the Big East. But instead, I think I’m just going to sit here in shock, and maybe look at tourism guides for Memphis and Greenville, NC, if I can bring myself not to cry as I do.

16 May 2003 / 5 Comments / Tags: realignment

Comments on “Realignment: Tech Stabbed In The Back”

  1. Damn this just sucks. I can’t get over the fact that we lost out to $%#ing BC. Northeast television markets my ass. I guess we only provide “television ratings,” while the acc only cares about “television markets.”

    It was nice of UVA to vote for us, but what was up with duke and unc switching their votes? From the espn article:

    “We were not in favor of expansion,” Duke president Nan Keohane said. “But since the decision to expand has now been made, we decided that we wish to be part of framing the outcome and to join with our partners in the conference in making this step as positive as possible for everyone involved.”

    WTF?? We don’t like it but we’re going to vote yes anyways? “As positive as possible for everyone involved.” I guess we’re not involved.

    /rant off

    Alex Kalita on May 16th, 2003 at 11:13 pm
  2. I love how one of the arguments for Miami joining the ACC is to cut down on travel expenses. … Bring Syracuse and BC as the other two teams don’t constitute cheap and close, but I take it that they won’t still play each other.

    The good news is that the proposed profits are proabably cooked a bit (or unrealistic). Hopefully Miami will consider such: http://espn.go.com/ncf/columns/maisel_ivan/1555070.html

    There are tons of hidden expenses to change. Often literally. Hopefully Miami will choose not to leave. It’d be funny if Miami chose to stay and Syracuse & BC left…that would be justice, if the ACC didn’t/doesn’t make SU & BC’s acceptance contingent on Miami’s accpetance. >:-)

    Andrew Hardin on May 18th, 2003 at 10:19 pm
  3. Duke, I’m not sure what it is. Carolina, I’m quite positive that it’s arrogance and spite. Carolina has hated our guts for fifty years, and the Beamer-to-UNC affair appears to have really pissed them off.

    Josh on May 18th, 2003 at 10:34 pm
  4. Oh, it’s a package deal. The ACC doesn’t really give a crap about SU or BC, and they only selected them because the other options were, in their eyes, worse (VT: hillbilly trailer trash; WVU: even worse; UConn: just not quite there in FB; Rutgers: total waste of time; Pitt: in a bad negotiating position because they just hired a new AD, and very likely to get swept in by the B11).

    Weaver has said we’ll try to buy Miami off, but not SU/BC. The way BC has acted during this whole mess (it took them ~5 seconds after the ACC announced to post the joyous news on their athletic department website, along with a glowing press release from their AD), I wouldn’t be surprised to see them get some sort of screwing on the way out the door.

    Josh on May 18th, 2003 at 10:48 pm
  5. Well, if the ACC doesn’t get screwed, I suppose I’ll have to try and hope for a good BC screwing (one way == Miami stays, if not the other == if Miami goes). Speaking of football and a good screwing, time to check out college football the news.

    Andrew Hardin on May 19th, 2003 at 7:04 pm